The source of a 1996 story that mentioned how badly he was taking his parents’ divorce appeared to have come from public comments his mother, the late Princess Diana, had given to reporters. Time and again, as Green laid out evidence to the contrary and what was described by Harry as a nefarious act had a more innocent explanation. He suggested other records had been destroyed. He said some of the journalists had been known for hacking or that there were invoices to third parties, including private investigators known for snooping, around the time of the articles. When pressed to be specific about what information had been illegally harvested, Harry repeatedly told the lawyer that the source of information in stories was “highly suspicious” or that he should ask the reporter who wrote the article. press, including allegedly racist articles, led him and his wife, Meghan, to flee to the U.S. press runs through his memoir, “Spare.” He blames paparazzi for causing the car crash that killed his mother, and said intrusion by the U.K. An ancestor, the future King Edward VII, appeared as a witness in a trial over a gambling scandal in 1891. The 38-year-old son of King Charles III is the first senior British royal since the 19th century to face questioning in a court. He suggested the articles were the result of phone hacking or some other unlawful information gathering method that “desperate journalists” relied on for any news nugget about his life. “Every single article has caused me distress.” “It isn’t a specific article it is all of the articles,” Harry said. “Is it realistic, when you have been the subject of so much press intrusion by so many press, both domestic and international, to attribute specific distress to a particular article from 20 years ago, which you may not have seen at the time?” Green asked. Harry was forced almost immediately to acknowledge that he wasn’t certain he read the 33 specific articles about him when they were published. Taken back in time to his 12th birthday and onward through early adulthood, he was confronted with articles that he has complained about and asked to identify the source of wrongdoing by Mirror Groups’s journalists. Green acknowledged that the duke had “lived a life of tabloid life intrusion,” and then in a sympathetic tone set about dismantling his case. Mirror Group denies or doesn’t admit his other allegations. Green apologized for the one instance Mirror Group has admitted to hiring a private investigator to dig up dirt on Harry, which was not among the claims he has brought.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |